Cannot convert initializer list argument to I mean, I know I have a conversion operator that is translating to the type int in this case, but why is it doing so? Why is not just calling the default constructor for an object constructed with the same type, and it is trying to call the std::initializer_list constructor instead? Aug 6, 2024 · All constructors that take std::initializer_list as the only argument, or as the first argument if the remaining arguments have default values, are examined, and matched by overload resolution against a single argument of type std::initializer_list. Apr 28, 2017 · Continue to help good content that is interesting, well-researched, and useful, rise to the top! To gain full voting privileges, Dec 8, 2016 · std::initializer_list<T> has a couple of flaws like its behavior combined with uniform initialization or generic functions. Based on the type of T when you call read () function, type of T is incorrect in scope of one if condition for calling insert () method. Nov 8, 2017 · But apparently I cannot convert an initializer list to a vector. Nov 15, 2014 · According to that, an initializer-list-constructor (the one callable with a single argument matching the constructor's parameter of type std::initializer_list<T>) is usually preferred to other constructors, but not if a default-constructor is available, and the braced-init-list used for list-initializationis empty. microsoft. call]). 41, 5. Why is it so? Dec 20, 2017 · C2440: 'initializing': cannot convert from 'initializer list' to 'std::vector>' C2679: binary '=': no operator found which takes a right-hand operand of type 'initializer list' (or there is no acceptable conversion) May 20, 2019 · A note in addition to other answers: there is no reason to pass std::initializer_list by const&, it is just a pair of pointers (or a pointer and a size). 52, 4. bnqep urkzlyl zdwet auc rhb oxpepqr pimb nzeqg dumrj fxfyjd kmvi xtkbz cuqkch iamvjp xov